Inspired simultaneously and erratically by the blog thoughts of both Stanley Lee and Ned Rorem.

Jul 8, 2004

This makes sense, if you know Steve Chiang:

i dont understand this guy:

drungken munk ee (7:34:48 PM): alright, lemme approximate some R, matey.
drungken munk ee (7:35:17 PM): when i take breaks from homework, i end up making up riddles and puns with my variables and functions.
naryantek (7:35:32 PM): thats probably the geekiest thing ive ever heard
drungken munk ee (7:35:47 PM): in numerical analysis, you can really talk like a pirate, 'cuz you work with the R-variable a lot.
naryantek (7:36:04 PM): theres a guy on our team dressed like a pirate??
drungken munk ee (7:36:34 PM): and i noticed that finite-iteration on g using newton's method can be abbreviated FIG Newton.
naryantek (7:37:00 PM): lol
drungken munk ee (7:37:06 PM): or guess how we denote the standard error of x...
drungken munk ee (7:37:06 PM): SE(x)
naryantek (7:37:17 PM): omg im audi
naryantek (7:37:27 PM): piz-nates
drungken munk ee (7:37:46 PM): no, wait! there's more!
drungken munk ee (7:37:46 PM): stay! you know you want it!
drungken munk ee (7:37:47 PM): you yearn for it!
drungken munk ee (7:37:47 PM): hunger!
drungken munk ee (7:37:47 PM): hunger!
drungken munk ee (7:37:51 PM): blub blub blub.
drungken munk ee signed off at 7:37:55 PM.

No comments:

Blog Archive

Followers