This is why I love Roger Ebert (regarding the new King Arthur movie):
I would have liked to see deeper characterizations and more complex dialogue, as in movies like "Braveheart" or "Rob Roy," but today's multiplex audience, once it has digested a word like Sarmatia, feels its day's work is done.
They even keep straight faces in the last shot, as the camera audaciously pulls back to reveal Stonehenge. That gives audience members a choice; they can think (a) "A-ha! So that explains Stonehenge!" or (b) "What a cheap shot to use Stonehenge as a location when it has nothing to do with anything," or (c) "What's that?"
Inspired simultaneously and erratically by the blog thoughts of both Stanley Lee and Ned Rorem.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2004
(88)
-
▼
July
(16)
- A list of the most badass people ever to walk the ...
- Stanley has been compiling a list of perverted mov...
- Inspired by the thoughts of Jeff, www.myung.org. ...
- This is a truly deep Kiefer Sutherland "24" addict...
- I'm reinstalling Windows XP at the moment. I had q...
- If all the text in mine and Stan's blog (www.leemu...
- There's right, there's left, and there's vogue: c...
- This is not a joke. After all the joking we've don...
- Chauvinism, apparently, spans the sexual-orientati...
- SUPPORT JEROME. LSATS FOR ASS! ('rome has an agree...
- Stan and I were discussing the G-spot the other da...
- Stan has the perfect idea: car LOCO 69: 24 is li...
- IT'S A BIG YEAR. For those of you pianists who rea...
- This is why I love Roger Ebert (regarding the new ...
- This makes sense, if you know Steve Chiang: i don...
- Straight Plagiarism, courtesy of Stanley Lee: att...
-
▼
July
(16)
No comments:
Post a Comment