Tupac Resurrection:
The advent of mass-public-accessible documentaries has arrived. Move over Bowling for Columbine. Move over Hoop Dreams. Welcome Tupac Resurrection.
This is a must-see, period. Done in virtually the same style as Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine, Tupac Resurrection is a posthumous quasi-auto-biographical telltale legend story about the controversy of Tupac Shakur - it is, in his words, "my life story about love, violence, betrayal, redemption, and passion." Thankfully shying away from East-West bullshit drama, the film conveys with literally no outside-perspective (it's done in 100% first person) the intelligence, politics, drama, and controversy of Tupac, showing the viewer the passion and redemption of perhaps the greatest and most notorious rapper in history.
"Tupac: Resurrection is about rap music, the forces that created it, and the world it then created. Shakur talks about the experiences and politics that went into his own music, in a way that casts more light on rap than anything else I've come across in a movie. Although rap is not music in the sense that you come out humming the melody, it's as genuine an American idiom as jazz or the blues, and it is primarily a medium of words, of ideology; a marriage of turntables, poetry slams, autobiography and righteous anger." (Ebert)
The hard part of making a Tupac film: Tupac is a California legend; our 90's version of a hip-hopesque John Lennon and virtually a national hero - he is an undisputed media icon, and a political and poetic thug-figure to all upcoming hip-hop artists. How do you show something in the film that we don't already know?
"Tupac had such vitality" - Yes, we know all of that, but never has a film made it so incredibly and articulately materialized. We don't need to be told anymore that Tupac had an incredible charisma and vitality; in this film, we are shown.
"Tupac was a thug" - Yes, we can see that by his tattoo on his abs. But contrary to popular opinion, Tupac was not born a thug, and he was not raised a thug. What the film paints of Tupac is a much more introspective picture of an extroverted person, a contemporary political poet caught in the anger of white-american racism who is painfully trying to act 10 times more 'thug' than he is, or ever was, or ever could be. In his own words, "I didn't have a record, until I had a record."
"Tupac was intelligent" - Yes, we know that as well - you can see that by his reading his lyrics. But I for one, didn't know the extent of Tupac's intelligence until this movie.
Please watch this movie. If you don't like Tupac or you're not a rap-fan, please find it in yourself to open your mind, expand your horizons, and indulge.
"As you listen to his uncanny narration of Tupac: Resurrection, which is stitched together from interviews, you realize you're not listening to the usual self-important vacancies from celebrity Q&As, but to spoken prose of a high order, in which analysis, memory and poetry come together seamlessly in sentences and paragraphs that sound as if they were written. Let's assume you are a person who never intends to see a doc about rap music, but might have it in you to see one. This is the one." (Ebert)
Inspired simultaneously and erratically by the blog thoughts of both Stanley Lee and Ned Rorem.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2003
(146)
-
▼
November
(10)
- Tupac Resurrection: The advent of mass-public-acc...
- Taken from Alex's blog: Aoccdrnig to rscheearch a...
- Had a long talk with Ryo tonight about that perpet...
- After almost 6 months of feeding off the cosmic-in...
- To be learned before the end of January: Rachmanin...
- I am about to receive over 900 dollars, and it sti...
- After spending almost an entire lifetime without t...
- Operation Money Saver has gone into effect: Starti...
- For years, I have tried to master the art of notat...
- Halloween in Mexico - an age-old, super-sacred tra...
-
▼
November
(10)
No comments:
Post a Comment